Phil Spector, Lana Clarkson, Angie Zapata, and Allen Andrade

“Dr. BLT”’s comment on the Phil Spector verdict reminded me of something that crossed my mind during the first trial. To put it simply, I wondered why Spector wasn’t charged with a hate crime. Now, in Colorado a man named Allen Andrade is on trial for the hate-crime murder of a transgender person named Angie Zapata (currently being covered on TruTV).

First, let me remind you that I know nothing about either of these cases that I didn’t see or hear in the media. I’m not a lawyer. I’m just a very opinionated former juror.

During the first Spector trial, I couldn’t help but wonder if Ms. Clarkson might be lesbian. The idea put a slightly different spin on the events of the night that ended in Ms. Clarkson’s murder. Remember, she mistook Mr. Spector for a woman and had to be told who he was and what gender he was. Second, she was quite tall, taller than Spector—statuesque enough to have played the “Barbarian Queen” and (suggestively) a small part in “Little Man on Campus” (2000). To me it was clear that Spector was humiliated by the incident and probably invited Ms. Clarkson home with him to make sure she understood how greatly she had mistaken his manliness. So, if she was not the sort of woman who was inclined to try to “sleep her way to the top,” what if Spector was doubly infuriated that night when she refused his advances? What if she told him she preferred women?

If so, it seems to me the prosecution could have charged Spector with a hate crime, as well as second-degree murder. Furthermore, it seems to me Ms. Clarkson’s sexual orientation might have been used effectively by the prosecution as a strong indicator that a homicide occurred, not a suicide. Under those circumstances it would have been clear that Spector was the person who felt wounded and angry at life that night, not Ms. Clarkson.

The question of Ms. Clarkson’s sexual orientation aside, I am torn about the whole hate-crime issue. My biggest concern is that women are never  included in the groups that deserve the special protection of hate-crime legislation. But frankly most rape-murders are nothing if they aren’t hate crimes against females. And in the Spector case, it was always clear to me that Phil Spector hates women.

For that reason, the Andrade trial seems a bit odd as a hate-crime trial to me. If Angie Zapata weren’t biologically a male, she wouldn’t have been protected by the Colorado hate-crime law.

 
Trackbacks
  • Trackbacks are closed for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • 4/17/2009 6:11 PM A Voice of Sanity wrote:
    This case is a perfect example of why the US criminal 'justice system' is a failure. People want to judge Spector by his looks, his life, other peoples' opinions of him - opinions which are not without bias.

    If you look at the actual evidence it is crystal clear that he is not guilty, that Lana killed herself in a moment of depression and opportunity.

    First, 55% of gun deaths are suicides.

    Second, a shot in the mouth is as good as a suicide note. It is extraordinarily unlikely to be a homicide - if you feel not, try to find some cases. The chances against this are in the hundreds of thousands.

    Third, the lack of GSR or body fluids on Spector (apart from traces he would get from rushing into the room afterwards) is sufficient to exclude him from involvement. Again the chances against this are in the hundreds of thousands.

    Fourth, all of the DNA on the gun and bullets was Clarkson's, none was Spector's. No one can wipe off theirs and leave another's in such a situation, ludicrous claims to the contrary notwithstanding.

    Fifth, he has no history of even threatening strangers - he saves that for those of some acquaintance and those occurrences were from years before and are allegations, not even reported as crimes.

    Sixth, Lana was in deep trouble, emotionally, medically and financially. She had expressed suicidal ideation before.

    With all of the evidence pointing to her suicide and none pointing to his involvement there is no reason to see this as other than a chance for her to go out in a blaze of glory - a weapon (she probably couldn't afford to buy) to hand and the opportunity to die famously in a star's home and not in her modest house as another unsung Hollywood failure.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.